SEARCH THIS BLOG

Categories

May 2016

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        

« APPELLATE COURT AFFIRMS TRIAL JUDGE DISCRETION IN FINDING THERE WAS NO PREVAILING PARTY FOR PURPOSES OF AWARDING ATTORNEY’S FEES TO EITHER SIDE OF A RETAINER DISPUTE | Main | FEHA WINNING MUNICIPAL ENTITY DENIED AN AWARD OF ATTORNEY’S FEES EVEN THOUGH FEHA CLAIMANT’S JURY AWARD WAS REVERSED EARLIER ON APPEAL »

May 31, 2008

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.