SEARCH THIS BLOG

Categories

September 2017

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30

« COURT OF APPEAL REVERSES $440,000 ATTORNEY’S FEES AWARD WHERE LOWER COURT IMPROPERLY TRUNCATED REVIEW OF THE ENTIRE LITIGATION FOR PURPOSES OF ASCERTAINING THE “PREVAILING PARTY” | Main | ABUSE OF DISCRETION STANDARD OF REVIEW—A “DAUNTING TASK” TO OVERCOME »

June 15, 2008

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.