SEARCH THIS BLOG

Categories

November 2017

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30    

« COURT OF APPEAL REVERSES $440,000 ATTORNEY’S FEES AWARD WHERE LOWER COURT IMPROPERLY TRUNCATED REVIEW OF THE ENTIRE LITIGATION FOR PURPOSES OF ASCERTAINING THE “PREVAILING PARTY” | Main | ABUSE OF DISCRETION STANDARD OF REVIEW—A “DAUNTING TASK” TO OVERCOME »

June 15, 2008

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.