SEARCH THIS BLOG

Categories

October 2014

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

« Diocese Fee Battle Ends . . . Fees Denied Because SLAPP Motion Was Not Frivolous | Main | Routine Costs: Parties Obtaining Rescission Properly Determined Not A Prevailing Party For Purpose Of Costs Award »

May 21, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e552305fbf883401156fa81d9e970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Civil Code Section “Prevailing Party” . . . . Court Of Appeal Reverses Determination That Property Seller Getting $29.75 Million Properties Back Was Not The Winner For Fee Purposes Where Buyer Got Back $1.13 Million Deposit:

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.