SEARCH THIS BLOG

Categories

Recent Posts

April 2014

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      

« Section 1717: Defendants Winning Appeal Where Settlement Agreement Had Fees Clause Were Entitled To Recovery During Motion Enforcement Proceedings | Main | Fee Clause Interpretation: Subcontractor Defeating General Contractors Cross-Defense Entitled To Fee Recovery Under Broadly Worded Fee Clause »

April 11, 2012

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e552305fbf88340168e9f25cbb970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Pending Cases: Kirby Argued, With California Supreme Court Justices Sounding Skeptical That Meal/Rest Break Claims Give Rise To Plaintiff Fee Exposure Under Labor Code Section 1194:

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.