SEARCH THIS BLOG

Categories

Recent Posts

November 2014

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            

« Allocation/Section 1717: Even Though Two Distinct Contracts Existed (With Only One Subject To A Fees Clause), All Fees Were Recoverable Because Work Related To Defensing The Nonrecoverable Oral Contract Claim Was Essential To Resolving The Recoverable Wri | Main | Prevailing Party/Section 1717/Section 998: Unlicensed Alarm Company Subject To Fee Exposure After Losing To Customer Under Contract With Fee Clause »

May 03, 2012

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e552305fbf883401676612a641970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Fees As Damages/Allocation: Fifth District Rules That Attorney’s Fees Expended To Clear Title Are Compensable Slander Of Title Damages Where Slander Contained In Recorded Instrument:

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.