SEARCH THIS BLOG

Categories

August 2018

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

« Private Attorney General:  Reversal Of Plaintiffs’ Mandate Petition Means Trial Judge Then Has To Entertain Motion For Section 1021.5 Fees | Main | Private Attorney General: Plaintiff’s Successful Injunction Against Public Agency Contract Bidding Process Did Not Justify CCP § 1021.5 Fee Recovery Plaintiff, Although Successful, Had Too Much Financial Incentive In Obtaining The Expensive Contract »

February 21, 2018

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.