Recent Articles
Sanctions: Orange County Superior Court’s Appellate Division Publishes Order Sanctioning Defendant’s Attorneys For Filing Briefs With AI Hallucinations
End Of The Order Makes Clear That The Appellate Division Will Report Imposition Of Sanctions On This Issue To The California State Bar. In Southland Homes…
Employment, Multipliers: Plaintiff Prevailing Under California’s Whistleblower Statutes Correctly Was Awarded Over $2.92 Million In Fees And $210,000 In Costs
Defendant’s Challenge To Application Of A 1.5 Positive Multiplier Was Rebuffed On Appeal. The California Whistleblower Protection Act (CWPA), Gov. Code section 8547 et seq.,…
Family Law: After Making Findings That Husband Had Better Access To Funds And Wife Had Overlitigated The Dissolution Case, Appellate Court Affirmed Lower Court’s Decision To Have Husband Waive A Spousal Support Overcharge In Consideration Of Waiving His Lesser Section 2030 Award To Wife
Husband’s Waiver Of A $12,750 Spousal Support Overpayment By Husband In Return For Foregoing Payment Of An Additional 2030 Award Of $4,000 To Wife Was…
Appealability, Landlord/Tenant, Non-Signatories, Reasonableness Of Fees: Prevailing Defendant Tenants, Including Two Non-Signatory Occupants, Properly Were Awarded Contractual Attorney’s Fees Under Lease Provisions When Defendants Defensed Plaintiff Landlord’s Unlawful Detainer Action Based On An Invalid Three Day-Notice
Fee Award Was $50,000, A Contractually Capped Amount, Even Though Defendants’ Counsel Expended $73,865 In Fees. In SM 10000 Property, LLC v. Chakchay, Case No. B350752…
Choice of Law, Prevailing Party: Where Plaintiffs Dismissed Contractual Claims, A Defendant Was Not Entitled To Attorney’s Fees In The Suit, Excluding Prior SLAPP Fee Recovery, Because Defendant Forfeited The Claim That New York Law Applied By Using California Law At Important Junctures Of The Litigation
Defendant’s Fee Request Was For Around $3.215 Million. Although this litigation was fierce, with defense parties winning SLAPP fees and contractual fees under California law,…
Sanctions: D.C. Circuit Sanctions An Appellee In A Federal Appeal By Striking Its Responding Brief For Containing AI Hallucinations
In A Per Curiam Published Order, Concurring Justice Touches On Some Other Issues In The Case. The D.C. Circuit federal appeals court has published a…
Special Fee Shifting Statutes: Six Plaintiffs Obtaining A $3.85 Million Jury Verdict After Seven Years Of Litigation Were Awarded $4,815,033.25 In Attorney’s Fees
Fee-Shifting Statute Was A Provision In The Trafficking Victims Protection Act. In Moore, et al. v. Rubin, No. 25-613-v (2d Dist. Sept. 4, 2026), the Second…
Family Law: In Case Where Both Ex-Husband And Ex-Wife Had Substantial Assets, The Lower Court Erred in Denying Family Code Section 2030 Fees To Ex-Wife Because It Did Not Make Express Findings On Relative Access To Funds Or On Relative Ability To Pay
Case Remanded To Reconsider The 2030 Fee Request (Including If Fees Were Appropriate); Fees Were Properly Denied Under Family Code Section 3557 Relating To Child…
Celebrities, Intellectual Property: After Winning The Merits Of Her Royalty Suit Against Mary Bono Who Invoked Copyright Termination Principles, Cher Loses The Secondary Battle For $1,023,605.50 In Attorney’s Fees Under The Copyright Act’s Fee-Shifting Provision
The Dispute, At Its Core, Was A Contract Dispute, Not Triggering Copyright Act Fee-Shifting. Sonny and Cher were icons in the music industry. Under a…
POOF!, Special Fee Shifting Statutes: Where Appellate Court Reversed CDAFA Jury Verdict Against Two Defendants, Prevailing Party Fees To Plaintiff Went POOF! On Appeal
Lower Court’s Denial Of Fees To A Prevailing Defendant Had To Be Reassessed Under The Court’s Earlier Hay Opinion Relating to Prevailing Defense CDAFA Fee Recovery Penal…
Employment, Reasonableness Of Fees: Where Plaintiff Won On 2 Out Of Eight Claims In CFRA/FEHA Case Against Defendant, Reduced $770,310 Fee Award Was Affirmed On Appeal
The Request Was $2.6 Million (Lodestar Plus 2.0 Positive Multiplier), With Lower Court Reducing Some Hourly Rates And Applying A Further 25% Reduction For Flawed…
SLAPP: Prevailing Defendant On A SLAPP Motion Targeting Abuse Of Process Claims Contractually Bargained Away Its Right To SLAPP Fee Recovery Under Two Settlement Agreements
Defendant Was Paid Under The Settlement Agreements, With The Appellate Court Finding No Public Policy Bar Against Bargaining Away SLAPP Fee Recovery. In Patel v. Vaghashia,…
Private Attorney General: Petitioner Winning Writ Of Mandate On City Clerk’s Removal Of Recall Petition Allegations Against Councilmember Was Erroneously Denied Private Attorney General Fees Based On The Case Not Providing A Significant Benefit
Majority Reversed And Remanded In A 2-1 Decision Based On Free Speech Principles, While A Dissenting Justice Found No Abuse Of Discretion In The Lower…
Billing Record Substantiation: Where Motion Paperwork And Billing Records Were Clear, Lower Court Erroneously Found Surety’s Request For Subsequent Fees Were Duplicative Where The Undisputed Evidence Showed The Second Request Involved Work For A Different Time Frame From The First Request
The Matter Was Remanded For Purposes Of Determining Whether The Second Requested Fees Were Reasonable In Nature. This next post shows the value of keeping…
Costs, Section 998: After Refusing To Grant Terminating Sanctions And After The Defense Won A Jury Trial Against Plaintiff, The Lower Court Erred In Taxing Expert Witness Fees Altogether Given The Valid/Reasonable/Good Faith Section 998 Offer Made By The Defense
Case Remanded To Consider The Defense Request For $288,733.55 In Expert Witness Fees. CCP section 998 can be a game changer, as it was in…
Services
About Cal Attorneys Fees
Cal Attorneys Fees is a trusted legal research platform designed for California lawyers to efficiently review case law and access concise abstracts relevant to their ongoing matters. With over 10,000 cited cases and articles, it serves as a comprehensive repository for informed, strategic advocacy.
Contact Us
Have questions or need support? Reach out to the Cal Attorneys Fees team for assistance with case law access, article submissions, or account inquiries — we’re here to help California lawyers work smarter and faster.
-
Sanctions: Orange County Superior Court’s Appellate Division Publishes Order Sanctioning Defendant’s Attorneys For Filing Briefs With AI Hallucinations
End Of The Order Makes Clear That The Appellate Division Will Report Imposition Of Sanctions On This Issue To The California State Bar. In Southland Homes & Real Estate and Investment, LLC v. Lam, Case No. 30-2026-01569207 (Orange County Super. Ct., App. Div. modified opinion Aug. 5, 2026; posted Sept. 10, 2026) (published), Presiding Judge Kimberly…
-
Employment, Multipliers: Plaintiff Prevailing Under California’s Whistleblower Statutes Correctly Was Awarded Over $2.92 Million In Fees And $210,000 In Costs
Defendant’s Challenge To Application Of A 1.5 Positive Multiplier Was Rebuffed On Appeal. The California Whistleblower Protection Act (CWPA), Gov. Code section 8547 et seq., has a mandatory prevailing party fee-shifting provision allowing reasonable attorney’s fees as provided by law to a party prevailing on a cause of action under CWPA. (See section 8547.10(c).) This…
-
Family Law: After Making Findings That Husband Had Better Access To Funds And Wife Had Overlitigated The Dissolution Case, Appellate Court Affirmed Lower Court’s Decision To Have Husband Waive A Spousal Support Overcharge In Consideration Of Waiving His Lesser Section 2030 Award To Wife
Husband’s Waiver Of A $12,750 Spousal Support Overpayment By Husband In Return For Foregoing Payment Of An Additional 2030 Award Of $4,000 To Wife Was A Reasonable Result. We liked Marriage of Mackey, Case No. B349404 (2d Dist., Div. 5 Sept. 10, 2026) (unpublished) because it seemed to do “rough justice” in a case where ex-wife…
-
Appealability, Landlord/Tenant, Non-Signatories, Reasonableness Of Fees: Prevailing Defendant Tenants, Including Two Non-Signatory Occupants, Properly Were Awarded Contractual Attorney’s Fees Under Lease Provisions When Defendants Defensed Plaintiff Landlord’s Unlawful Detainer Action Based On An Invalid Three Day-Notice
Fee Award Was $50,000, A Contractually Capped Amount, Even Though Defendants’ Counsel Expended $73,865 In Fees. In SM 10000 Property, LLC v. Chakchay, Case No. B350752 (2d Dist., Div. 5 Sept. 9, 2026) (unpublished), plaintiff landlord filed an unlawful detainer action against defendant signatory tenant and two other non-signatory tenants named as occupants. The lower court…
-
Choice of Law, Prevailing Party: Where Plaintiffs Dismissed Contractual Claims, A Defendant Was Not Entitled To Attorney’s Fees In The Suit, Excluding Prior SLAPP Fee Recovery, Because Defendant Forfeited The Claim That New York Law Applied By Using California Law At Important Junctures Of The Litigation
Defendant’s Fee Request Was For Around $3.215 Million. Although this litigation was fierce, with defense parties winning SLAPP fees and contractual fees under California law, one defendant who never raised a conflict of law issue in previous crucial junctures was not allowed a substantial attorney’s fees recovery because it never argued clearly before the fee…
-
Sanctions: D.C. Circuit Sanctions An Appellee In A Federal Appeal By Striking Its Responding Brief For Containing AI Hallucinations
In A Per Curiam Published Order, Concurring Justice Touches On Some Other Issues In The Case. The D.C. Circuit federal appeals court has published a per curiam order in Douglas v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co., No. 2023-CAB-005422 (D.C. Cir. Sept. 3, 2026) where it sanctioned a firm representing an appellee (federal parlance for respondent, if…