SEARCH THIS BLOG

Categories

October 2019

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

« ARBITRATOR DOES HAVE POWER TO DETERMINE TO FIND THAT NO PARTY WAS THE PREVAILING PARTY FOR PURPOSES OF BEING AWARDED FEES. | Main | DISCRETION, DISCRETION, DISCRETION: TRIAL JUDGES DO NOT HAVE TO CREDIT EXPERT TESTIMONY ON THE VALUE OF ATTORNEY SERVICES IN FEE CONTESTS. »

May 22, 2008

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.