SEARCH THIS BLOG

Categories

May 2020

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

« ARBITRATOR DOES HAVE POWER TO DETERMINE TO FIND THAT NO PARTY WAS THE PREVAILING PARTY FOR PURPOSES OF BEING AWARDED FEES. | Main | DISCRETION, DISCRETION, DISCRETION: TRIAL JUDGES DO NOT HAVE TO CREDIT EXPERT TESTIMONY ON THE VALUE OF ATTORNEY SERVICES IN FEE CONTESTS. »

May 22, 2008

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.