SEARCH THIS BLOG

Categories

February 2020

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29

« Prevailing Party/Section 998/Section 1717: Defendant Prevailed Under Section 1717 Because Earlier Appellate Court Decision Found Reversal And No Need For Retrial | Main | Special Fee Shifting: Qui Tam Claimant Whacked With $300,000 Fee Award Under Arizona Fee Shifting Statute Did Not Obtain Reversal »

March 25, 2011

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.