SEARCH THIS BLOG

Categories

May 2022

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        

Archives

More...

« Class Actions/Costs/Multiplier/Reasonableness Of Fees: Plaintiffs Winning Vacation Pay Labor Code Class Action Also Garner Costs Of $145,341.93 And Attorneys Fees Of $5,722,008 | Main | Section 998/Section 1717: Where Germane Contract Lacked Fees Clause And 998 Offer Only Allowed Fees If Appropriate, Plaintiff Accepting 998 Offer Properly Denied Fees »

September 28, 2013

Insurance: Insurance Carrier Withdrawing Reservation Of Rights And Coverage Defenses Does Not Need To Continue Paying Cumis Counsel

 

2/7 DCA So Rules In Published Decision.

     Swanson v. State Farm Gen. Ins. Co., Case No. B240016 (2d Dist., Div. 7 Sept. 23, 2013) (published) addressed this narrow but important issue for California insurance coverage practitioners: Does an insurer withdrawing all reservations of right and coverage defenses have to continue paying insured’s Cumis counsel after the withdrawal decisions? Answer: No.

Posted at 03:36 PM in Cases: Insurance |

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.