SEARCH THIS BLOG

Categories

July 2020

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

« Intellectual Property, Prevailing Party: $1,518,687.94 In Fees Against Three Losing Defendants Justified In Lanham Act False Endorsement Case Involving Bob Marleys Image | Main | Allocation, Fee Clause Interpretation, Section 998: Defendant Prevailing Under Fees Clause Entitled To Unapportioned Fee Recovery, Another Plaintiff Not Entitled To Fees Given Failure To Show Fees Clause Was Part Of Contract, And Defendant Properly Denied »

February 20, 2015

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.