SEARCH THIS BLOG

Categories

January 2019

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

« Family Law: $210,000 Section 271 Sanctions Award Upheld On Appeal | Main | Equity/Special Fee Shifting Statute: Dissenting Brother, Who Lost Partition Sale Dispute, Not Erroneously Saddled With Fees And Costs Incurred By Other Prevailing Siblings »

November 23, 2016

Comments

Plaintiffs Attorney

The opinion should be published. That was my first thought.

Then I noted you believe the same. You wrote the opinion "is an important primer on the proper methodology."

Consider sending a CRC 8.1120 letter. I think maintaining this blog constitutes sufficient "interest" under subdivision (a)(2) of the Rule.

The comments to this entry are closed.