SEARCH THIS BLOG

Categories

March 2019

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

« Family Law: $210,000 Section 271 Sanctions Award Upheld On Appeal | Main | Equity/Special Fee Shifting Statute: Dissenting Brother, Who Lost Partition Sale Dispute, Not Erroneously Saddled With Fees And Costs Incurred By Other Prevailing Siblings »

November 23, 2016

Comments

Plaintiffs Attorney

The opinion should be published. That was my first thought.

Then I noted you believe the same. You wrote the opinion "is an important primer on the proper methodology."

Consider sending a CRC 8.1120 letter. I think maintaining this blog constitutes sufficient "interest" under subdivision (a)(2) of the Rule.

The comments to this entry are closed.