March 2017

Insurance: Over $1 Million in Brandt Fees Affirmed On Appeal

Cases: Insurance

    Trial Judge Got Allocation Of Policy Benefit-Oriented Fees Right.         Saddleback Inn, LLC v. Certain Underwriters of Lloyd’s London, Case No. G051121 (4th Dist., Div. 3 Mar. 30, 2017) (unpublished) involved an insured which was awarded $2.8 million against an insurer based on a policy reformation as well as $50,000 in punitive […]

Prevailing Party: Trial Judge’s Decision To Award No Fees–Here Results Were Mixed–Was No Problem

Cases: Prevailing Party

  Alter Ego Allegations Likely Drove The Result Here.       In Dominski v. Lazar, Case No. B268187 (2d Dist., Div. 5 Mar. 29, 2017) (unpublished), which involved a custom home construction dispute, homeowners did prevail against the construction company but did not prevail against the construction company principal despite alter ego allegations which did not

Undertaking: Attorney’s Fees/Costs Award Pending For Determination On Appeal Does Not Need To Be Bonded After Satisfaction of Prior Compensatory Parts

Cases: Undertaking

  4/3 DCA Weighs In—Going With Ziello On The Issue, But Inviting Legislative Reform.       Quiles v. Parent, Case No. G054353 (4th Dist., Div. 3 Mar. 27, 2017) (published), a by-the-court decision through a panel consisting of Presiding Justice O'Leary, Justice Fybel, and Justice Ikola, considered this question: Does a litigant need to bond

Homeowner Associations: HOA Losing Tree Trimming CC&R Properly Hit With $200,000 In Fees And $20,621.15 In Costs

Cases: Homeowner Associations

  HOA Disputes Can Be Costly, Especially With Fee Shifting! Aspen trees. 2015. Carol M. Highsmith, photographer. Library of Congress.     We have explained that HOA – homeowner disputes can be costly. Especially where one party prevails, in this case the homeowner. In Lingenbrink v. Del Rayo Estates Homeowners Assn., Case No. D070966 (4th Dist., Div.

Family Law/Reasonableness Of Fees: Trial Judge Awarding Only $15,000 In Fees And Costs Based On Requested $77,067.50 In Fees And $17,459.77 In Costs Was No Abuse Of Discretion

Cases: Family Law, Cases: Reasonableness of Fees

  Deferential Standard Of Review Not Hurdled In This One.     In Zauner v. Defterios, Case No. B271922 (2d Dist., Div. 6 Mar. 21, 2017) (unpublished), appellant sought needs-based fees in a child custody modification proceeding. She requested $77,067.50 in fees and $17,459.77 in costs, but was only awarded $10,000 in fees and $5,000 in costs.

Scroll to Top