SEARCH THIS BLOG

Categories

December 2019

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        

« Fee Clause Interpretation/Section 1717:  Fifth District, In Split Decision, Decides That Permissive Fee Clause Is Enforceable By Its Terms, With Section 1717 Not Applying | Main | Private Attorney General:  Reversal Of Plaintiffs’ Mandate Petition Means Trial Judge Then Has To Entertain Motion For Section 1021.5 Fees »

February 21, 2018

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.