SEARCH THIS BLOG

Categories

May 2021

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          

« Intellectual Property: D.N.J. Fed. Court Awards $13.8M In Attorney’s Fees And Costs To Defendant Zimmer Inc. In 13-Yr. Patent Infringement Battle With Howmedica Osteonics, Finding That The Matter Was “Exceptional” Under Patent Fee-Shifting Statute | Main | Fee Clause Interpretation: Fee Recovery To Litigant Prevailing On Cross-Complaint With Mixed Tort/Contract Claims Properly Denied Because Fees Clause Only Related To More Narrow “Account” Issues »

May 29, 2018

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.