SEARCH THIS BLOG

Categories

March 2019

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

« Construction: California Supreme Court Decides That Prompt Payment Statutes Relating To Direct Contractor-Subcontractor Retention Withholdings Can Only Relate To The Relevant Specific Payment Otherwise Due Rather Any Dispute Between The Parties | Main | Section 998: 4/3 DCA Concludes Defense CCP § 998 Offer Was Valid, Reversing Trial Court’s Denial Of Cost Shifting »

May 15, 2018

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.