SEARCH THIS BLOG

Categories

January 2019

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

« Construction: California Supreme Court Decides That Prompt Payment Statutes Relating To Direct Contractor-Subcontractor Retention Withholdings Can Only Relate To The Relevant Specific Payment Otherwise Due Rather Any Dispute Between The Parties | Main | Section 998: 4/3 DCA Concludes Defense CCP § 998 Offer Was Valid, Reversing Trial Court’s Denial Of Cost Shifting »

May 15, 2018

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.