SEARCH THIS BLOG

Categories

September 2019

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          

« Consumer Statutes: Defendant/Cross-Complainant Properly Awarded Attorney’s Fees Against One Unsuccessful Cross-Defendant, But Other Cross-Defendants Correctly Denied Fees Under Consumer Statutes And Civil Code Section 1717 Even Though Cross-Complainant | Main | Special Fee Shifting Statute: Trial Court Did Not Abuse Its Discretion In Awarding $95,000 in Attorney’s Fees To Plaintiff Under CCP 1021.4, Discretionary Fee-Shifting Provision Where Civil Cases Involves Defendant’s Felony Offense(s). »

May 23, 2018

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.