SEARCH THIS BLOG

Categories

May 2020

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

« Section 998: No Attorney’s Fees Recoverable By CCP § 998 Prevailing Party In California Disabled Persons Act/Unruh Act Case Because No Liability Finding That Plaintiff’s Rights Under These Statutes Were Violated In Case Seeking Monetary Damages | Main | Employment: 4/3 DCA Decides That Nanny Winning Berman De Novo Hearing Not Entitled To Fee Recovery Because She Opted For Administrative Remedy And Was Not A Prevailing Respondent (But A Prevailing Appellant Not Entitled To Fees) »

January 24, 2019

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.