SEARCH THIS BLOG

Categories

June 2020

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        

« Fee Clause Interpretation: “Successor/Agent” Provision In Purchase Agreement Properly Led To Fee Award In Favor Of Prevailing Defendant Agent, Where Plaintiff Did Not Object To Instruction Stating Defendant Was An Agent | Main | Indemnity: LLC Operating Agreement Provision Was An Indemnity, Not A Fees Clause, Requiring Reversal Of A $71,032.50 Fee Award To Prevailing Plaintiffs. »

May 31, 2019

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.