SEARCH THIS BLOG

Categories

August 2020

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          

« Fee Clause Interpretation: “Successor/Agent” Provision In Purchase Agreement Properly Led To Fee Award In Favor Of Prevailing Defendant Agent, Where Plaintiff Did Not Object To Instruction Stating Defendant Was An Agent | Main | Indemnity: LLC Operating Agreement Provision Was An Indemnity, Not A Fees Clause, Requiring Reversal Of A $71,032.50 Fee Award To Prevailing Plaintiffs. »

May 31, 2019

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.