SEARCH THIS BLOG

Categories

June 2021

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      

« Fee Clause Interpretation: “Successor/Agent” Provision In Purchase Agreement Properly Led To Fee Award In Favor Of Prevailing Defendant Agent, Where Plaintiff Did Not Object To Instruction Stating Defendant Was An Agent | Main | Indemnity: LLC Operating Agreement Provision Was An Indemnity, Not A Fees Clause, Requiring Reversal Of A $71,032.50 Fee Award To Prevailing Plaintiffs. »

May 31, 2019

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.