SEARCH THIS BLOG

Categories

February 2021

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28            

« Employment: $46,062 Fee Award Out Of Requested $104,771 Was No Abuse Of Discretion Where Co-Counsel Fees Seen As Unnecessary And .6 Negative Multiplier Applied | Main | Fee Clause Interpretation: Fee Clause In PPM Did Not Cover Plaintiffs’ Negligence “Lost Investment” Lawsuit »

June 07, 2019

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.