SEARCH THIS BLOG

Categories

December 2021

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

« Employment: $46,062 Fee Award Out Of Requested $104,771 Was No Abuse Of Discretion Where Co-Counsel Fees Seen As Unnecessary And .6 Negative Multiplier Applied | Main | Fee Clause Interpretation: Fee Clause In PPM Did Not Cover Plaintiffs’ Negligence “Lost Investment” Lawsuit »

June 07, 2019

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.