Beyond That, Judgment Did Not Have A Fees Award In It.
In Salcido v. Platinum Home Mort. Corp., Case No. B289010 (2d Dist., Div. 2 Dec. 20, 2019) (unpublished), the trial judge awarded $137,700 in attorney’s fees to a party to a settlement agreement which encompassed “enforcement” or “interpretation” of the agreement, which had been reduced to a judgment which did not contain fees award language. The 2/2 DCA reversed, finding that the fees involved activities to enforce various court postjudgment enforcement orders, which did not fall within the “enforce/interpret” language of the fees clause. Furthermore, the settlement agreement had been merged into and extinguished by the judgment, which fatally did not contain a fees award component.
“Respondents do not cite any case supporting the conclusion that an agreement authorizing attorney fees for a prevailing party in an action to interpret or enforce a settlement agreement applies to an action to enforce court collection orders entered pursuant to a subsequent judgment.”
Comments