SEARCH THIS BLOG

Categories

September 2021

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30    

« Private Attorney General: Plaintiff Only Obtaining A Non-Merits Stay In A CEQA Action, In A Dismissed Case, Was Not Entitled To CCP § 1021.5 Fees | Main | Allocation, Fee Clause Interpretation, Reasonableness Of Fees: Reducing Requested $1.36 Million Fee Award, By 25% To $943,028, Was No Abuse Of Discretion Based On $1.2 Million-Plus Recovery And Rejection Of Low Ball Defense Settlement Offer »

February 26, 2020

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.