SEARCH THIS BLOG

Categories

October 2022

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          

« Private Attorney General: San Juan Capistrano Competing Hotel Developer Denied CCP § 1021.5 Fees Because Developer’s “Upside” Did Not Vindicate A Broader Public Interest And Developer Had A Large Personal Stake In The Litigation | Main | Costs, Employment: Plaintiff Obtaining Only $900 In Statutory Penalties And A Minor Statutory Fees Award On A Single Claim Properly Denied Costs »

June 04, 2020

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.