SEARCH THIS BLOG

Categories

September 2022

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30  

« Fee Clause Interpretation, Section 1717: In San Diego Real Estate Investment Dispute, One Fee Award Of $227,734.32 Reversed While Another Fee Award Of $75,262.50 Affirmed | Main | Fees On Fees, SLAPP: Trial Court’s Additional Award To Successfully SLAPPing Defendant Of $15,660 In Fees And $368.44 In Costs After Initial Fees Award Of $10,910 And $60 In Costs Was No Abuse Of Discretion »

January 22, 2021

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.