Reason Was Pretty Simple—The Claiming “Successful” Party Was Not Upon Reversal.
City of Gardena v. State Water Resources Control Board, Case No. G059466 (4th Dist., Div. 3 Sept. 22, 2021) (unpublished) is a situation where certain litigants won CCP § 1021.5 fees after prevailing on a regional water board dispute. The total fees came close to $2.2 million, assuming our math is correct in this opinion. However, on appeal, the merits judgment was reversed for the parties which were awarded fees. Based on the merits reversal, the fee awards fell also. Former “successful” parties made a run at it on appeal, but the 4/3 DCA—in an opinion authored by Justice Fybel—had to overturn the fee award because they were not successful in the end.
Comments