Trial Judge Did Not Err In Granting Sanctions For Central RFA Denials In The Case.
In Nilson v. White, Case No. D077046 (4th Dist., Div. 1 Sept. 16, 2021) (unpublished), plaintiffs lost a case where they sought to hold their attorneys responsible for a loss of a farming business through a nonjudicial foreclosure. The trial judge also granted the winners $211,032.50 in RFA costs-of-proof sanctions. The court of appeal affirmed because these were central RFAS which were not correctly denied and were apportioned out as far as awarding costs to the winning parties.
Comments