Only One Item Out Of The List Was Improperly Awarded.
The general rules for awarding routine costs to a prevailing party can be distilled down this way: some are expressly allowable; some are expressly not allowable; and if costs are not mentioned in the first two categories, they are awardable in the courts discretion if found reasonable and necessary to the conduct of the litigation. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1033.5(a), (b), (c)(4).) The appellate court in Engel & Engel, LLP v. Shuck, Case Nos. B297421/B300755 (2d Dist., Div. 2 Nov. 4, 2021) (unpublished) affirmed a lower court’s award of three items of costs, but reversed one costs award as being improper. Here are the results: (1) trial transcripts were improperly awarded because they are not recoverable unless “court ordered” (which they were not) and are distinct from allowable court reporter fees; (2) electronic presentation expenses were proper because the lower court expressly found they were helpful; (3) arbitration transcripts were allowable because only court transcripts are expressly disallowed unless court ordered; and (4) a trial support vendor’s fee was proper because it was subsumed in the electronic presentation component.
Comments