SEARCH THIS BLOG

Categories

October 2024

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Archives

More...

« Equity, Fee Clause Interpretation: Prevailing Party Awarded Substantial Fees Despite A Bad Typo In The Contractual Fees Provision | Main | Deeds Of Trust, Fee Clause Interpretation, Indemnity: After Paying Off Loan Demand, Non-Prevailing Borrower On Economic Duress/Implied Covenant Claims Correctly Assessed With Contractual Fees Of $2,856,956.82 And Costs Of $38,184.54 »

March 16, 2023

Ethics: Trial Judge Properly Excluded Expert Testimony On Ethic Legal Conclusions

Application Of Law To Facts Is Not One For Experts To Opine On.

            In Timed Out LLC v. Prisma Entertainment LLC, Case No. B309791 (2d Dist., Div. 3 Mar. 16, 2023) (unpublished), a litigant opposing a fee request proffered attorney declarations opining that no fees should be awarded because the prevailing party’s attorneys violated various California ethical provisions.  The lower court sustained objections that the testimony offered legal conclusions which was the province of the lower court to decide.  The appellate court agreed.  Legal conclusions in the guise of expert opinion testimony are most always improper.  (Summer v. A.L. Gilbert Co., 69 Cal.App.4th 1155, 1179 (1999).)

Posted at 08:20 PM in Cases: Ethics |

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.